In such a case, there would not be a federal assessment decision at all, similar to the effect of the equivalency provisions under CEAA Ultimately, the timing of the initiation is left to the discretion of the proponent. There are many cross-cutting and other issues that deserve separate attention, such as public participation, transparency issues, the role of Indigenous peoples, learning, accountability, multi-jurisdictional cooperation, climate change, assessment of projects on federal lands and outside Canada, among others.
Offshore Offshore wind energy is a renewable technology capable of supplying significant energy in a sustainable way. Harmonization The general approach to harmonization with other jurisdictions with assessment responsibilities under the proposed Act is one of cooperation, but with flexibility to harmonize through delegation or substitution at the discretion of the Minister.
It means to pose clearer requirements for comprehensive environmental impact studies to be undertaken by the developers and to build on national baseline information to be able to take decisions in an EIA process, while the formal legal frame is actually in place in the target countries and cannot be much criticised.
The Minister can, on request or on her own, require a project to be assessed that is not on the list. It starts with the Agency proposing a list of issues, based on input from the public and any jurisdiction the Agency has consulted with. The potential offshore visibility depends on topography, vegetation caver and artificial structures existing on the landscapes.
It remains to be seen who else will have responsibilities for ensuring adequate information is before the Agency or Panel on issues such as alternatives, impacts on Indigenous communities and rights, and social, economic and health impacts of proposed projects, and how this information will be gathered within the time frames permitted.
However, this appears designed not to replace the significance finding under CEAAbut rather to clarify the basis for federal jurisdiction to make a project decision. If you have any queries or concerns about how your personal data will be handled, contact MS-LOT by email at: Substitution decisions appear to be made on a project by project basis.
With promises of "more predictable and consistent timelines", decisions based on "robust science, evidence and Indigenous traditional knowledge" and more coordination with the provinces "to support one project one assessment", we will be closely following the progress of this draft legislation, as its potential to usher in a new era of federal project impact assessment might have significant impacts on the future of Canada's industries and economy, but also on federal-provincial and Crown-Indigenous relations.
The proponent then responds with an indication of the information it intends to provide in response to the issues that have been identified.
The effects of the curvature of the earth and lighting conditions are relevant in the visibility of offshore wind farms Wratten et al, This material may be protected by Copyright Law.
The total offshore installed capacity in Europe at the end of was almost 1, MW, distributed in the coastal waters of Denmark, Ireland, The Netherlands, Sweden and the UK, representing almost 2 per cent of the total wind energy 56, MW in the EU.
Decisions to refer a project to a Review Panel are to be made within 45 days of the commencement of the assessment.
The existing "standing test," which acts as a threshold that is determinative of who can participate in the regulatory review process, is being eliminated in order to give members of the public a greater chance to provide input.
This exercise should be undertaken early enough in the planning stage of projects for selection of environmentally compatible sites,process technologies and such other environmental safeguards.
Bird conservation groups continue to voice their concerns about impacts of this project, and the potential of future larger scale projects on the Great Lakes, on migratory animals including birds, bats, and insects.
Nor is Bill C clear about the impact of information gathering beyond the preparation of the impact statement on the time limits for the assessment phase.
A key change to scoping includes the addition of a number of factors to be assessed in section 22 when compared to the elements in section 19 of CEAA Finally, the Agency can decide that the project can proceed without an EA.
However, there is not enough scientific knowledge to determine the maximum thresholds permitted for certain effects Koeller et al, ; Thomsen et al, The public is to have an opportunity to participate in the regional or strategic assessment, and to have access to relevant information. The measurements carried out during construction of North Hoyle wind farm in UK indicate that: Coast Guard were cooperating agencies in the preparation of the final EA.
Most importantly, at least one of the panel members are to be appointed from these energy regulators when the project is one that they regulate.
There is no opportunity provided in Bill C to appeal or otherwise review the decision or its basis. Most of the experience gained in offshore wind energy comes from several years of monitoring three wind farms in Denmark Middelgrunden, Horns Rev and Nysted installed between to This is a new provision.
The resulting process options at the end of the planning process are essentially the following: No further details are provided in Bill C on the process or the outcome of a regional or strategic assessment. However, Minister McKenna has indicated that the federal cabinet will retain its right to approve projects that it feels are in the national interest, even if an assessment process determines a project could cause significant environmental, health, or socio-economic effects.
For Panel Reviews, the approach to harmonization is focused on joint assessments. The assessments are to be carried out by the Agency or through a committee, with terms of reference to be established or approved by the Minister. This includes the continuation of the long tradition of carrying out joint assessment with the provinces, a process that has generally worked well in the past.
It starts with a project description prepared by the proponent in accordance with regulations. The key difference between cooperative assessments and delegation or substitution is that through delegation and substitution, the assessment or parts of it are done by another jurisdiction, and the results are then used for federal decision making.
The need for such exercises will have to be decided after initial evaluation of the possible implications of a particular project and its location.Environmental Assessments are concise public documents that a Federal agency prepares under NEPA to provide sufficient evidence and analysis to determine whether a proposed agency action would require preparation of an environmental impact statement or a finding of no significant impact.
posted: November 14, Environmental Impact Assessment Part ~ Table of Contents - Executive Summary Part ~ Project Description Offshore Aggregate Dredging at Yallahs, St.
Thomas. posted: Final Report Executive Summary Proposed Development of Mona Estates and Beverley Hills, St. Andrew. The shift from environmental assessments (EAs) under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2 (CEAA ) to “impact assessments” (IAs) under the Impact Assessment Act 3 (IA Act) will be acutely felt in the offshore oil and gas industry.
The application requires detail about the proposed project and the environmental sensitivities of the area. Consultation on Environmental Impact Assessment amending Scottish Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations to Transpose Directive /52/EU: Offshore Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment.
“The aim of Environmental Impact Assessment is to protect •‘Screening’ is a procedure used to determine whether a proposed project is likely to have significant effects on the environment. European sites and European offshore marine sites). Environmental Impact Assessment Project Report.
submit this Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Project report for the proposed Offshore Sea Sand Harvesting from Likoni through Waa to Tiwi in South Coast of the Indian Ocean for Construction of the Port Reitz Cargo Terminal of the Mombasa – Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway Project.Download